"As for magical realism, we need only extend hands to achieve it ". Carpentier,A. The kingdom of this world.
It is difficult from such extensive lands and varied
customs and traditions to make a synthetic analysis of the Latin American
essence. Alejo Carpentier knew very well how difficult this task was; to
address the issue he decided to face the reality of the people who compose it,
discovering the fantastic existence in the majesty of a continent where the
wonder and magic could be found at every turn. This is how Latin America
becomes the stage on which magic and reality coexist in harmony, because the
reality of these people is magic and magic is reality thereof.
There are hundreds and
thousands of demonstrations of magic that are part of the Latin American
reality: not to marry on a Tuesday, the chupacabras, walking under a ladder, a black cat
crossing your way, and many others are examples of superstitions. It is
believed that the Latin American religion is a byproduct of the conquest, mixed
with indigenous customs and even the influence of the beliefs of slaves brought
from Africa; both would be the point where superstition and magic emerge among
the peoples of Latin America. To be honest it is not my intention to question
if it is all really true or not, but rather to concur with this theory that
yes, there is magic in Latin America. And it is that magic which makes Latin
America a reality.
Both
Indigenous and Latin American blood run through my veins, and I have always
been intrigued about knowing more about my ancestors, the Mapuches. The magic
in the Mapuche people is reflected in various ways: using powerful healers who
spoke in tongues to effect cures, they also believe that through talking to
certain animals one can receive powers to lead or govern, and even to receive
answers . The legend teaches could challenge the Spanish army for 4 centuries
because of the advice they received from nature. The healers do not talk about
what their secret magic is in their daily lives because in reality they do have
them, they simply and magically heal in reality. This is a perfect example of where
reality and magic come together to form part of the essence of Latin America.
As I
have displayed in my earlier blogs, it is very difficult to speak about just
one Latin American culture when so much variety and diversity is in it.In order to be one culture there should be
something that exists that unites them into one.Without a doubt, I believe that the most
powerful characteristic in Latin America which could be considered as the same
is the music.
To think
of a Latin America on mute, without music, is like thinking in a rainbow in
black and white. One explanation of this is that despite the social, historical
and cultural differences of the people or the language, the Latin American
people have reflected in the best way the words of Friedrich Nietzche who said
that life without music would be a mistake.
At the same time Latin American music has been the key in maintaining their
roots and customs alive.
Since
when could we speak about musical manifestations that belong to the Latin
American identity? Does it come from before the time of the conquest? Or was it
born after the period of independence? As we have discussed in class these are the questions of the Latin American soul and we may never reach an agreement in their responses but I believe that music can help us answer those questions, because music in Latin America is History. For the most part, the Latin American nations reached independence at
the beginning of the 19th century, and the latest ones in the 20th
century. In the search for Latin
American cultural identity, our people do not focus on the similarities with
the dominant European models, but with what identifies us.
Without even being able to speak the language
of its songs, some of us can find in reproductions of Latin American music the
magic that it transmits; the music that allows us to fly to places and
memories; the magic that transmits Latin American music is the same magic that
these diverse cultures come together as one.
It is
its rhythms and its music in Latin America that still inspire some of the
greatest musicians from history, like Frank Sinatra, to sing one of the most
beautiful songs from Brazil, Garota de
Ipanema.
Many Latin American artists and authors have dedicated their
works in unifying the Latin American people and talk of just one culture. We
know that this culture is not unique; moreover, it is composed of a diverse
spectrum of traditions, customs and histories.
This may be the reason why the Mexican murals don’t really mean anything
to me and perhaps why, in the same way, Chilean art does not mean anything
to them either. Why, then, do these artist strive so much to unite cultures
that are so clearly different?
Nicolás Guillen through his work Sensemaya, and his other works reveal the influence of African
Americans in Cuba with the intent to integrate it in the origins of the
Hispanic American culture. Pablo Neruda
also attempts to be the spokesman for those who were victims in the history of
the destruction of the Incan Empire through his work Las Alturas de Machu Picchu.
In both examples we find the authors trying to incorporate voices that
help us to better understand where the Latin American identity comes from,
uniting them through the various races which they are composed of.
Despite the efforts of these diverse artists, how many Latin
Americans actually feel pride in their African or Incan roots? The culture is so diverse that sometimes I
have to ask myself in what Latin America I lived in that I do not know the one
that is interpreted by the works of some artists and authors.
Perhaps the idea of unifying Latin America as only one
culture through art isn’t more than just a political manifestation. I don’t think that it is a coincidence that
these artists who unite and create this idea of one Latin American culture also
shared the same political socialistic ideals.
Guillen belonged to a communist party in Cuba, as did Neruda in Chile.
We have most likely heard of the supremacy
that exists in the Latin American mural art that tells and represents the
history of Latin America. However, what is the true role that these mural art
pieces have in Latin America. How is it that the murals unify Latin America in
just one culture?. The mural art is a present
reality in Latin American culture that transcends borders, people, and
dialects. But, why do we only find them on a larger scale more common in Latin
American culture and not so much in other cultures?
"Presencia de América Latina"
If I analyze the Mexican murals
by Rivera with those that are found in Chile, I think that we find more than just
a representation of identity.The majority
of the Mexican murals were painted after the Mexican revolution during a time
when the people were extremely divided by history; a people who oppressed the
workers and the farmers that fought to overcome the effects of the war, one
being illiteracy.Therefore, these
murals had the intention to teach the story through images for those who did
not know how to read.Its main purpose
was so that all would see it and come together again as a society after the
division that the Revolution had produced.In Chile, we find that most of the murals that were painted were done
during the dictatorship as a manifestation of their disapproval of Pinochet’s
regimen military.These murals invited
the unification of the people in order to defeat oppression. So, in both
countries we find that after a period of division, murals begin to appear as
instruments in unifying the masses.
Perhaps in Latin American history
there have been great divisions among the people and that is why we find so
many murals.These divisions have been
so profound that maybe that is where the idea of great murals comes from;
murals that play a powerful role as a tool in unifying the people.
“During
Mass, Conceicao kept appearing between me and the priest.” (-Joaquim Maria
Machado de Assis “Midnight Mass” p. 101).
One of the
things that characterize Machado is the ability that the author possesses as a
writer to invite his readers to find what lies deeper than what is on the
surface of his stories.This method
converts the readers into co-authors of the work. This idea of exploring
through his stories is reflected in the same way when we try to find answers to
the origin of Latin America.
As in the end of
the story “Midnight Mass,” Machado represents the idea that he is viewing the
woman Conceicao as an infinite being during the mass when he cannot get her out
of his head. This is because he has not been able to read and understand her
completely. The author leaves the end of this story open to the reader and
invites them to do what he could not, figure her out.
Machado said, “We
kill time, but time is what buries us.” The way in which he invites us to kill
time is through thinking about the things that we haven’t been able to figure
out.We know that history has buried
many things, and we should continue to think and analyze in order to contribute
to the future and earn our right to judge the past.Many are the theories such as Malinche,
Iracemas, or Pocahontas, that all result in the pondering and searching for a response
for the questions which up until now have not be answered. Even now, time has
resolved to bury this lost piece of the puzzle, the answer to the question of
where we come from in Latin America.
Machado helps us
understand that we cannot understand his books without analyzing them to find
the ending that best complements our reality.In the same way, we will not comprehend the origin of Latin America
without thinking and analyzing the past for ourselves.
This reminds me
of a video of a selective attention test. It demonstrates how sometimes we have
to look at things more than once in order to completely understand the reality
of them. In the case of the origin of the Latin American, we perhaps need more
Malinches and Iracemas to help us understand the history.